ramzis wrote: ↑08 Sep 2023, 14:45 Klubo valdyboj sėdi Glazeriai, kurie samdo taip vadinamus C-level executivsus, su kuriais klubą ir valdo

Klubas vargsta jaug daug metų su strategija, valdysena ir korporacine kultūra. Toną tam būtent valdyba su aukščiausio lygio vadovais ir užduoda

To pasekoj vyksta nuolatinė klubo korozija - aikštėj nuo vienų iš kasmetinių favoritų laimėt lygą iki TOP4 strugglerių, išleidžiant krūvą pinigų ir nelabai turint už juos ką parodyt

Už aikštės ribų - dar blogiau

Nežinau, kada šita okupacija pasibaigs ir kurioj vietoj šita korozija pasibaigs

Bet jei/kai pasibaigs, tai bus galima kažko tauresnio paragaut


Tik vis tiek nesinori, kad būtent šeichai nuo glazerių išlandsbergintų

The_Red_Army wrote: ↑27 Sep 2023, 23:40 Sancho gali zaisti LW, AMC, RW, bet reikia buti gerai dauztam, kad galvotum jog jis bus tavo RW, kur realiai is visu poziciju LW arba AMC(su kazkiek free role ir daug involving) aiskiai geriausios Sancho pozicijos pries RW.

T-Wolves wrote: ↑20 Sep 2023, 15:05 Ole davė pirmą išsamesnį interviu po atleidimo: https://theathletic.com/4877764/2023/09 ... man-utd-2/

Did you want to sign Sancho and how do you think he’s done?
Yes, I wanted to sign him. Manchester United will never sign a player the manager doesn’t want. That’s not the case everywhere. Jadon was put up as the No 1 target for the right wing by the scouts and when you look at his talent, I could see why.

Unfortunately, it has not worked out. When he arrived, he had to go to hospital and that was a setback as he couldn’t start the first games. He’s immensely talented and we haven’t seen the best of him. I hope we do, but he prefers to play left wing… where Marcus plays.

Phect wrote: ↑08 Sep 2023, 15:06 Kiek zaidejai tos corporatyvines kulturos mato? Nes atrodo, kad problema ne tik su corpu, bet ir susigninamu zaideju charakteriu. Ar tikrai galima viska ant Glazeriu sumest?

Tommy wrote: ↑08 Sep 2023, 18:30

Tommy wrote: ↑07 Sep 2023, 19:53

Phect wrote: ↑07 Sep 2023, 16:07 Tai realiai patvirtino, kad bent vienas "memeber of staff" žinojo apie įvykį.
Bet kaip ir px, klubas dėmesį nuo šitos istorijos gali nukreipt pamazgas ant su psichologinėm problemom kovojančio Sancho supildamas (pamirštant dar visai neseniai duotus kibirus supporto Dele Alli).

Kad čia nesusiję dalykai. Ir šiaip United valdžia per daug buka, kad būtų įmanomas toks scenarijus.

Nu gerai, po šiandienos briefo apie tarp žaidėjų ir Sancho prabėgusią katę atsiimu žodžius. Mančikas visame gražume.

T-Wolves wrote: ↑08 Sep 2023, 09:36

Phect wrote: ↑18 Feb 2023, 16:51

ramzis wrote: ↑18 Feb 2023, 09:52 Anglų visuomenė pramiegojo geros valdysenos reguliavimo įdiegimą tokiems bendruomeniniams dariniams kaip futbolo klubai, kai buvo įsileista daryt visokius leveraged buyoutus, parazituojančius savininkus, abejotino plauko savininkus, ne vakarietiško pasaulio režimus, sportwasherius...


Dabar pastėrę žiūri į visokių glazerių, moshirių ir "nuo valstybės atskirtų fondų" bajerius, o pirminė žala padaryta jau prieš dešimtmečius

Anglų visuomenei ant good corporate governance yra giliai pajabat, nes "Londė" jau daugybę metų buvo ir yra safe haven ruzzkių, CCP ir kitų šiukšlių verslams ir atžaloms. O ir futbolas yra blue collar mužikų pramoga, tai valdžiai ant reguliacijos šioje vietoje dvigubai pajabat.
Nepaisant to, Vokietija, Nyderlandai, Šveicarija ar US šiame kontekste niekuo nesiskiria.

Matt Lawton, Paul Joyce

On the day that the club cancelled Cristiano Ronaldo’s contract, the Glazers released a statement saying that they were trying to find new investment, either to acquire a share of the club, or buy it outright, which would end the Glazers’ 17-year ownership.

They have appointed the Raine Group, an American bank that found a buyer for Chelsea this year, to be United’s advisers and another bank, Rothschild and Co, will advise the Glazer family.

Unlike with the sale of Chelsea by Roman Abramovich, the Glazers are in no rush to sell the club but are seeking a record price for a sports franchise.

Sources have indicated they want an unprecedented sum because of the digital potential of a club boasting more than one billion supporters globally.

The Glazers said the process would also examine how best to improve Old Trafford. In a joint statement, Avram and Joel Glazer said: “We will evaluate all options to ensure that we best serve our fans and that the club maximises the significant growth opportunities available to it today and in the future.”

The news will be particularly well received among United’s fanbase, who have been protesting against the owners for years.

The move follows a similar recent one by Fenway Sports Group, the American owner of Liverpool, to announce it was inviting investment.

The news came hours after United revealed that they had released Ronaldo, who is at the World Cup with Portugal, without paying him the £15.5 million owing on his contract, which had been due to expire next summer.

The Glazers’ declaration will be welcomed by United supporters who have become increasingly vocal in their protests against the Americans, who have taken hundreds of millions of pounds out of the club in dividends, while United has remained a commercial success. The chant “Love United, hate Glazers” has been sung regularly at Old Trafford.

The Glazers bought United in 2005 in a £790 million deal that was extensively funded by debt, and the club was valued at £3.7 billion by Forbes in the summer. A sale at that price would outstrip the £2.5 billion deal that Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital struck to buy Chelsea in June. There was a guarantee of a further £1.75 billion investment in the club.

Ratcliffe, a boyhood United fan, was rebuffed by the Glazers in the summer after signalling his intent to buy the club.

Those numbers are likely to have captured the Glazers’ attention, while the collapse of the European Super League and the rise of clubs owned by Gulf states are two more reasons why there is now an appetite to explore what interested parties are out there.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe, a boyhood United supporter and the billionaire behind Ineos, will be linked with a takeover, having registered an interest in the summer. The Times subsequently reported last month that two of the Glazer brothers, Joel and Avram, had told him the club was not for sale.

The landscape now appears to be changing, however, with the need to overhaul Old Trafford another reason why investment is required.

There is unlikely to be a shortage of interest in one of the world’s most storied sports franchises.

Tommy wrote: ↑04 Nov 2022, 20:41Bet tas nuo šiol pasikeis, klubas jau pradėjo protingų žmonių headhuntinimą su ambicija tapti 'dominuojantys' futbolo duomenų moksle.

T-Wolves wrote: ↑12 Oct 2022, 09:31

Deal to include “anti-Glazer clauses” and dividend restrictions

But other clauses, described by sources as “anti-Glazer clauses” in reference to the debt-laden ownership model at Manchester United, have also been inserted into the purchase agreement.

These will stop the new owners from paying dividends or receiving management fees for the same ten-year period. There will also be a limit on the level of debt that the club can take on.

kokos wrote: ↑15 Feb 2022, 00:15 Kaip Man U nusigyveno, tai baisu ir pagalvot.
Dar desėtka metelių nuo Fergusono pasitraukimo praeis ir marškinėlių su puodeliais prekyba užstrigs, nes post Tiktokerių karta pamirš apie seneliumbą serą, o forumo liūtų žiedas bus jau gerokai aptrupėjęs.
Gal užkaskim šitą subforumą ir eikim palaikyti United of Manchester, nes kvepia kelialapiu į aukštesnę debilizmo lygą kartu su Evertonu.

T-Wolves wrote: ↑02 Feb 2022, 20:21 Kai United fanai skanduoja Glazer out, Tom Brady apie tuos pačius Glazerius visai kitos nuomonės.